The PJRC

The Peace Exchange Bulletin
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to the PJRC now!

    Make a tax-deductible donation of $25 or more and receive an autographed copy of Tom Hayden's newest book!

    Inspiring Participatory Democracy: Student Movements from Port Huron to Today

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    4/12 - Los Angeles Times Festival of Books

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town!

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Wednesday
      Dec022009

      Obama Announces Afghanistan Escalation

      It's time to strip the Obama sticker off my car.

      Obama's escalation in Afghanistan is the last in a string of disappointments. His flip-flopping acceptance of the military coup in Honduras has squandered the trust of Latin America. His Wall Street bailout leaves the poor, the unemployed, minorities and college students on their own. And now comes the Afghanistan-Pakistan decision to escalate the stalemate, which risks his domestic agenda, his Democratic base, and possibly even his presidency.

      The expediency of his decision was transparent. Satisfy the generals by sending 30,000 more troops. Satisfy the public and peace movement with a timeline for beginning withdrawals of those same troops, with no timeline for completing a withdrawal.

      Obama's timeline for the proposed Afghan military surge mirrors exactly the eighteen-month Petraeus timeline for the surge in Iraq.

      We'll see. To be clear: I'll support Obama down the road against Sarah Palin, Lou Dobbs or any of the pitchfork carriers for the pre-Obama era. But no bumper sticker until the withdrawal strategy is fully carried out.

      But for now, the fight is on.

      This is not like the previous conflict with Bush and Cheney, who were easy to ridicule. Now this orphan of a war has a persuasive advocate, a formidable debater who will be arguing for support from the liberal center--one who wants to win back his Democratic base.

      The antiwar movement will have to solidify support from the two-thirds of Democratic voters who so far question this war. Continuing analysis from The Nation and Robert Greenwald's videos have a major role to play. Public opinion will have to become a growing factor in the mind of Congress, where Representative Jim McGovern's resolution favoring an exit strategy has 100 co-sponsors and Rep. Barbara Lee's tougher bill to prevent funding for escalation is now at 23.

      Key political questions in the immediate future are whether Representative David Obey, chair of the House Appropriations Committee, will oppose Afghanistan funding without a surtax is only bluffing, and whether Senator Russ Feingold will step up with legislation for a withdrawal timetable.

      Beyond public persuasion and pressuring Congress, activists are sure to be hitting the streets and precincts in the year ahead. The antiwar movement has a certain leverage based on the current doubt in the minds of voters and policy experts, and the potential dissent from within the Obama base. Democratic turnout increased 2.6 percent in 2008 over 2004, while Republican votes dropped by 1.3 percent. Twenty-two million more young people voted in 2008 than in 2004. The unprecedented energies of those young people who volunteered their time, money and hope could drain away by 2012, if not sooner.

      In addition, the peace movement will be globalizing its reach as Obama seeks to extract more troop concessions from wary NATO countries. Opposition is particularly strong in the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany and France. When Obama accepts the Nobel Prize in Oslo on December 10, he may address as many as ten thousand protestors.

      Adding 30,000 to 35,000 US troops will raise the US death toll by over 1,000 by 2011 on Obama's watch, in addition to the 750 who died under Bush. The numbers of US wounded are rising faster than ever, with 300 counted in the past three months. Civilian casualties are under-reported according to the UN mission in Afghanistan. The budgetary costs are growing to $75 billion annually, and could become another trillion-dollar war.

      The albatross of the Karzai government will threaten any plans to rapidly expand the Afghan army and police, themselves divided along sectarian lines. In 2005, the Kabul regime ranked 117th on the list compiled by Transparency International; by this year it was 176th.

      There are alternatives. There is evidence that the Taliban in Afghanistan are seeking a peace settlement without havens for Al Qaeda. There also is an October 11 statement by Gulbaddin Hekmatyer of Hezb-I-Islam Afghanistan, a mujahadeen leader and former prime minister in the 1990s, once funded by the CIA. Never reported in the US media, the letter proposes an honorable exit strategy, including

      • relocation of Western troops from Afghan cities, plus a logical and practical time schedule for their withdrawal;

      • transfer of power to an interim government independent of the parties currently fighting;

      • new elections under an independent election commission;

      • release of political prisoners;

      • a possible peacekeeping force from neutral Islamic countries;

      • and, more importantly for the Obama agenda, the document states: Hezb-I-Islami is prepared to discuss the exit of all foreign fighters (non-Afghan, be it forces of the West, or embedded with the Mujahideen). We assure all sides that we agree that neither the embedded fighters with the Mujahideen nor foreign military forces be allowed to remain or to establish military bases or training camps in Afghanistan.

      But instead of pursuing an Afghan-based political settlement without havens for Al Qaeda, the US strategy is to pursue the same goal through more boodshed, leaving Afghanistan somewhere between the Stone Age and ashes. What is obsessive about this approach is the fact that there is no longer an Al Qaeda haven in Afghanistan, which means the US troops are fighting Afghan insurgents in their own country. But if your primary tool is a hammer, as the saying goes, all problems appear to be nails.

      The war clearly is shifting to Pakistan, a far more clandestine and dangerous conflict fought by American secret operatives on the ground and drones from the sky. The targets are twofold: (1) to eliminate the Afghan Taliban from their enclave in Quetta instead of negotiating with them, and (2), using US advisers and drones, to push Pakistan's army into a war against Pakistan's homegrown Taliban and other insurgents now in the tribal areas, impoverished and unrepresented in Pakistan's institutions. This approach so far has caused a sharp expansion of violent attacks and suicide bombings across the region. The fear of a destabilized Pakistan with scores of nuclear weapons may lead Obama's advisers to soon present the president with a more apocalyptic scenario than anything so far, if they have not already.

        This article originally appeared in The Nation on December 1, 2009.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      References (1)

      References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
      • Response
        With the sad fading of the "change" mirage, it is hard to avoid concluding that the American party system needs fundamental restructuring to create a political force capable of representing the interests of the American people, rather than the elite. Can Progressive Democrats, Ron Paul Republicans, Greens, and Naderites manage to ...

      Reader Comments (11)

      As a description, this is fine. But what is the explanation for Obama seemingly betraying everything he supposedly stood for?

      December 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterYoav Peled

      Well I've payed attention to the Obama Presidency and reactions so far... you stop supporting Obama and take his bumper sticker off your car? Ok.

      The only reason for lack of support for Obama is racism, or coded racism, or masked racism, or hidden racism.. When exactly did you become an extremist and racist? Clearly we should ignore you because you're analogous to the KKK and nothing you can say will have any bearing.

      What? We were told this over and over during and after the election; only racism explains the dislike or distrust of Obama... so clearly you've now become racist. That or maybe those arguments are, and always have been specious? Naah, that many liberals can't be that wrong; you must be a racist now. Is this a sudden change, or have you always been a racist?

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterErtdfg

      Pathological wisdom-free morons who hate the United States; why; you probably hate your parents, too. Try psychotherapy, but stay out of politics--or move to Cuba, or even France to get a dose of reality about your "humane" state.*

      Alternatively, stop being a ten-year-old, like your buddy Obama.

      *PS: moving to Canada doesn't count. Canada rides piggyback, at best (parasite at worst) on "evil" USA, be it cheap drugs or a lot more.

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterParisParamus

      Hey Tom, I wonder if you'll survive the 30 year reign of TeaParty-endorsed Presidents.

      Instead of blaming evil conservatives and Republicans, buy a clue MIRROR and look in it.

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterParisParamus

      Tom, Jimmy Carter could always run again...

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered Commentermesablue

      "I feel dumber just for having read your article." - Terry

      yea but the responses more than made up for it ; )

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterugly kid joe

      I love the moron horde! Few comments from the choir from 12/20 until this has-been gets linked to the HQ, then suddenly comes new life.

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterHeywood Jablowme

      Wait, wasn't Afganistan the "good war" which Iraq was a distraction from? Or was it Sudan?

      January 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAmy Winehouse

      Porsche Design replica watchesThe watches we produced is characterized by its high quality, compact size, energy saving and is also easy to learn and easy to operate.

      August 11, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterhuangedison

      yes it's time for a long time to leave Afghanistan. nothing to do there

      November 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterSlavon

      PostPost a New Comment

      Enter your information below to add a new comment.
      Author Email (optional):
      Author URL (optional):
      Post:
       
      Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>