The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 



    Follow Tom


    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.

      Garzón to Represent Assange

      Baltasar Garzón.A renowned human rights lawyer, Spain's Baltasar Garzón, is now representing the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, in multiple jurisdictions where he may face legal charges or possible extradition.

      Garzón is best known for indicting Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, and was censured recently by the Spanish court for attempting to open the archives into massacres and cover-ups committed during the Spanish Civil War era. Feared and despised on the right, the jurist has unmatched experience in handling human rights cases spanning several jurisdictions. He adds significant gravitas to the Assange defense team.

      Assange remains inside the Ecuadoran embassy in London, and the Quito government is expected to render a decision on his asylum request sometime in August. The Ecuadoran government, while openly friendly to Assange's cause, has delayed announcing a decision on the asylum request for reasons so far unknown.

      In a press conference, Garzón pledged to battle for a fair trial of Assange in whatever judicial proceeding he faces, from his asylum request, to the Swedish request for extradition from the United Kingdom, to a possible trial in Sweden, or if the US government seeks to extradite him.

      A federal grand jury has been subpoenaing witnesses and poring over documents for months, with no public decision on his possible indictment or extradition. The US ambassador to Australia, Jeffrey Bleich, has denied on several occasions that the US has plans to indict and extradite Assange, though acknowledging that grand jury proceedings are secret and ongoing.

      A US trial of Assange would be followed by the world media as the most significant whistleblower and freedom of the press cases since the Pentagon Papers trial of Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo in 1971, which the government lost in a fiasco in which the presiding judge was offered a high appointment by a Nixon White House official.

      Indicting or prosecuting Assange might turn into a disaster for the White House with the media, civil liberties groups and the peace movement. Assange currently is fighting a Britsih extradition order to Sweden where he faces possible sexual harassment charges. The US government could allow current proceedings to run their course, unless the White House to congressional pressure for an indictment, which has come from the Republican representative Peter King and Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein. But a concession to the hardliners would open the administration to charges of election-year opportunism, refocus the Assange case on the secrets revealed in the WikiLeaks documents, and require unanimous consent from a jury. 

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (1)

      "Sex Lies and Julian Assange" - an excellent documentary by Australian ABC, which shows that nobody objected to Assange leaving Sweden. So it's high time for Swedish prosecutors
      to go to London and question him there! It's as simple as that!

      August 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterVoila41

      PostPost a New Comment

      Enter your information below to add a new comment.
      Author Email (optional):
      Author URL (optional):
      All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.