The PJRC

The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 

     

     

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Wednesday
      Sep072011

      9/11 Blind

      This article originally appeared in the Sacramento News & Review and other weekly alternatives in Detroit, Oakland, Rochester, Santa Cruz, and elsewhere.

      We’re 10 years past the twin towers attack and still fighting wars in its name. When will we open our eyes?

      The numbers we almost never see: A total of 6,197 Americans were killed, as of mid-August, in the wars fought avenging 9/11, a day when 2,996 Americans died. The total wounded has been 45,338. The active-duty military-suicide rate for the last decade is at a record high of 2,276. After witnessing the first jetliner crash into the Twin Towers on that Sept. 11 morning, the wife and 7-year-old daughter of a friend of mine fled to their nearby Manhattan loft and ran to the roof to look around. From there, they saw the second plane explode in a rolling ball of flaming fuel across the rooftops. It felt like the heat of a fiery furnace.

      Not long after, the girl was struck with blindness. She rarely left her room. Her parents worked with therapists for months, trying various techniques including touch and visualization, before the young girl finally recovered her sight.

      “The interesting new development,” my friend reports, “is that she no longer remembers very much, which she told me when I asked her if she would be willing to speak with you.”

      That’s what happened to America itself 10 years ago this Sunday on 9/11, though it might be charged that many of us were blinded by privilege and hubris long before.

      But 9/11 produced a spasm of blind rage arising from a pre-existing blindness to the way much of the world sees us. That in turn led to the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Afghanistan again, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia—in all, a dozen “shadow wars,” according to The New York Times. In Bob Woodward’s crucial book, Obama’s Wars, there were already secret and lethal counterterrorism operations active in more than 60 countries as of 2009.

      From Pentagon think tanks came a new military doctrine of the “Long War,” a counterinsurgency vision arising from the failed Phoenix program of the Vietnam era, projecting U.S. open combat and secret wars over a span of 50 to 80 years, or 20 future presidential terms. The taxpayer costs of this Long War, also shadowy, would be in the many trillions of dollars and paid for not from current budgets, but by generations born after the 2000 election of George W. Bush. The deficit spending on the Long War would invisibly force the budgetary crisis now squeezing our states, cities and most Americans.

      Besides the future being mortgaged in this way, civil liberties were thought to require a shrinking proper to a state of permanent and secretive war, and so the Patriot Act was promulgated. All this happened after 9/11 through democratic default and denial. Who knows what future might have followed if Al Gore, with a half-million popular-vote margin over George Bush, had prevailed in the U.S. Supreme Court instead of losing by the vote of a single justice?

      In any event, only a single member of Congress, Barbara Lee of Berkeley-Oakland, voted against the war authorization, and only a single senator, Russ Feingold, voted against the Patriot Act.

      Were we not blinded by what happened on 9/11? Are we still? Let’s look at the numbers we almost never see.

      Fog of War
      As to American casualties, the figure now is beyond twice those who died in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C., on 9/11. The casualties are rarely totaled, but they are broken down into three categories by the Pentagon and Congressional Research Service.

      There is Operation Enduring Freedom, which includes Afghanistan and Pakistan but, in keeping with the Long War definition, also covers Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Second, there is Operation Iraqi Freedom and its successor, Operation New Dawn, the name adopted after September 2010 for the 47,000 U.S. advisers, trainers and counterterrorism units still in Iraq. The scope of these latter operations includes Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.

      These Has the specter of 9/11—as remembered in this iconic photo of Manhattan before the collapse of the first tower—somehow blinded America? (Photo by Michael Foran)territories include not only Muslim majorities but also, according to former Centcom Commander Tommy Franks, 68 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves and the passageway for 43 percent of petroleum exports, another American geo-interest that was heavily denied in official explanations. (See Michael Klare’s Blood and Oil and Antonia Juhasz’s The Bush Agenda for more on this.)

      A combined 6,197 Americans were killed in these wars as of Aug. 16, 2011, in the name of avenging 9/11, a day when 2,996 Americans died. The total American wounded has been 45,338, and rising at a rapid rate. The total number rushed by Medivac out of these violent zones was 56,432. That’s a total of 107,996 Americans. And the active-duty military-suicide rate for the decade is at a record high of 2,276, not counting veterans or those who have tried unsuccessfully to take their own lives.

      Sticker Shock of War
      Among the most bizarre symptoms of the blindness is the tendency of most deficit hawks to become big spenders on Iraq and Afghanistan, at least until lately. The direct costs of the war, which is to say those unfunded costs in each year’s budget, now come to $1.23 trillion, or $444.6 billion for Afghanistan and $791.4 billion for Iraq, according to the National Priorities Project.

      But that’s another sleight-of-hand, when one considers the so-called indirect costs like long-term veterans’ care. Leading economists Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes recently testified to Congress that their previous estimate of $4-6 trillion in ultimate costs was conservative. The president himself expressed “sticker shock,” according to Woodward’s book, when presented cost projections during his internal review of 2009.

      The Long War casts a shadow not only over our economy and future budgets, but our unborn children’s future as well. This is no accident, but the result of deliberate lies, obfuscations and scandalous accounting techniques. We are victims of an information warfare strategy waged deliberately by the Pentagon.

      As Gen. Stanley McChrystal said much too candidly in February 2010, “This is not a physical war of how many people you kill or how much ground you capture, how many bridges you blow up. This is all in the minds of the participants.” David Kilcullen, once the top counterinsurgency adviser to Gen. David Petraeus, defines “international information operations as part of counterinsurgency.”

      Quoted in Counterinsurgency in 2010, Kilcullen said this military officer’s goal is to achieve a “unity of perception management measures targeting the increasingly influential spectators’ gallery of the international community.”

      This new “war of perceptions,” relying on naked media manipulation such as the treatment of media commentators as “message amplifiers” but also high-technology information warfare, only highlights the vast importance of the ongoing WikiLeaks whistle-blowing campaign against the global secrecy establishment.

      “The more we know about the Long War doctrine, the more we understand the need for a long peace movement,” writes Hayden. Here are a few books he recommends in that pursuit: Obama’s Wars, by Bob Woodward, The Bush Agenda by Antonia Juhasz, and Blood and Oil by Michael Klare. Consider just what we have learned about Iraq and Afghanistan because of WikiLeaks: tens of thousands of civilian casualties in Iraq never before disclosed; instructions to U.S. troops not to investigate torture when conducted by U.S. allies; the existence of Task Force 373, carrying out night raids in Afghanistan; the CIA’s secret army of 3,000 mercenaries; private parties by DynCorp featuring trafficked boys as entertainment; and an Afghan vice president carrying $52 million in a suitcase. The efforts of the White House to prosecute Julian Assange and persecute Pfc. Bradley Manning in military prison should be of deep concern to anyone believing in the public’s right to know.

      The news that this is not a physical war but mainly one of perceptions will not be received well among American military families or Afghan children, which is why a responsible citizen must rebel first and foremost against The Official Story. That simple act of resistance necessarily leads to study as part of critical practice, which is as essential to the recovery of a democratic self and democratic society.

      Read, for example, this early martial line of Rudyard Kipling, the English poet of the white man’s burden: “When you’re left wounded on Afghanistan’s plains and the women come out to cut up what remains/ just roll to your rifle and blow out your brains/And go to your God like a soldier.” Years later, after Kipling’s beloved son was killed in World War I and his remains never recovered, the poet wrote: “If any question why we died / Tell them because our fathers lied.”

      A Hope for Peace
      The military occupation of our minds will continue until many more Americans become familiar with the strategies and doctrines in play during the Long War. Not enough Americans in the peace movement are literate about counterinsurgency, counterterrorism and the debates about “the clash of civilizations”—i.e., the West versus the Muslim world.

      The writings of Andrew Bacevich, a Vietnam veteran and retired Army lieutenant colonel whose own son was killed in Iraq in 2007, is one place to begin. Bacevich, a professor at Boston University, has written The New American Militarism and edited The Long War, both worth absorbing.

      For the military point of view, there is the 2007 Army-Marine Counterinsurgency Field Manual developed by Gen. Petraeus, with its stunning resurrection of the Phoenix model from Vietnam, in which thousands of Vietnamese were tortured or killed before media outcry and Senate hearings shut it down.

      Not enough is being written about how to end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, but experts with much to say are the University of Michigan’s Scott Atran (Talking to the Enemy) and former UK envoy Sherard Cowper Coles (Cables from Kabul). Also there is my own 2007 book, Ending the War in Iraq, which sketches a strategy of grass-roots pressure against the pillars of the policy (the pillars necessary for the war are public opinion, trillions of dollars, thousands of available troops, and global alliances; as those fall, the war must be resolved by diplomacy).

      The more we know about the Long War doctrine, the more we understand the need for a long peace movement. The pillars of the peace movement, in my experience and reading, are the networks of local progressives in hundreds of communities across the United States. Most of them are citizen volunteers, always immersed in the crises of the moment, nowadays the economic recession and unemployment. Look at them from the bottom up, and not the top down, and you will see:

      • the people who marched in the hundreds of thousands during the Iraq War;
      • those who became the enthusiastic consumer base for Michael Moore’s documentaries and the Dixie Chicks’ anti-Bush lyrics;
      • the first to support Howard Dean when he opposed the Iraq war, and the stalwarts who formed the anti-war base for Barack Obama;
      • the online legions of MoveOn who raised millions of dollars and turned out thousands of focused bloggers;
      • the voters who dumped a Republican Congress in 2006 on the Iraq issue, when the party experts said it was impossible;
      • the millions who elected Obama president by an historic flood of voluntary enthusiasm and get-out-the-vote drives.
      • the majorities who still oppose the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, and want military spending reversed.

      This peace bloc deserves more. It won’t happen overnight, but gradually we are wearing down the pillars of the war. In February of this year, Rep. Barbara Lee passed a unanimous resolution at the Democratic National Committee calling for a rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan and transfer of funds to job creation. The White House approved of the resolution. Then 205 House members, including a majority of Democrats, voted for a resolution that almost passed calling for the same rapid withdrawal. Even the AFL-CIO executive board, despite a long history of militarism, adopted a policy opposing Afghanistan.

      The president himself is quoted in Obama’s Wars as opposing his military advisors, demanding an exit strategy and musing that he “can’t lose the whole Democratic Party.” In the end, the president decided to withdraw 33,000 American troops from Afghanistan by next summer, and continue “steady” withdrawals of the rest (68,000) from combat roles by 2014.

      Mind The Gap
      Obama’s withdrawal decision upset the military but also most peace advocates he presumably wanted to win back. The differences revealed a serious gap in the inside-outside strategy applied by many progressives.

      After a week of hard debate over the president’s plan, for example, Sen. John Kerry invited Tim Carpenter, leader of the heavily grass-roots Progressive Democrats of America, into his office for a chat. Kerry had slowly reversed his pro-war position on Afghanistan, and said he thought Carpenter would be pleased with the then-secret Obama decision on troop withdrawals. From Kerry’s insider view, the number 33,000 was a very heavy lift, supported mainly by Vice President Joe Biden but not the national security mandarins. From Carpenter’s point of view, 33,000 would seem a disappointing too little, too late. While it was definite progress toward a phased withdrawal, bridging the differences between the Democratic liberal establishment and the idealistic progressive networks will remain an ordeal through the 2012 elections.

      These elections present an historic opportunity to awaken from the blindness inflicted by 9/11. Diminishing the U.S. combat role by escalating the drone wars and Special Operations could repeat the failure of Richard Nixon in Vietnam. Continued spending on the Long War could repeat the disaster of Lyndon Johnson. A gradual winding down may not reap the budget benefits or political reward Obama needs in time.

      With peace voters making a critical difference in numerous electoral battlegrounds, however, Obama might speed up the “ebbing,” plausibly announce a peace dividend in the trillions of dollars, and transfer those funds to energy conservation and America’s state and local crises. His answer to the deficit crisis will have to include a sharp reduction in war funding, and his answer to the Tea Party Republicans will have to be a Peace Party.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (13)

      Outstanding piece, Tom. In May, 1945 we had a victory parade in Milan. Tens of thousands of people lined the streets, hung from balconies, trees, signs, and lampposts to cheer. Their laughter and tears moved all of us in the 88th Infantry Division. Who is cheering us today? The American flag has become s/thing very different from what it was in 1945. As Nietzsche said, "Whoever battles with monsters had better see to it that he doesn't
      become a monster."

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMarvin Mandell

      Thank you Tom. Still, no mention of the numerous very legitimate questions about how the buildings fell. Building 7 in particular. How can these questions continue to be essentially ignored after all these years, and especially in view of what our country has done, and has wrought, over the decade. Why aren't what are considered thoughtful and rational people demanding answers?

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterTobi Dragert

      Yes, Tobi's question is at the core of pursuing real peace and justice. imo, "thoughtful and rational" people have been trying to demand answers, but the official story that is parroted by the media does not allow for such investigation. E.g., on NPR the other day, the opening line was, "the facts of 9-11 are indisputable..." It is very reasonable to suppose that 'real' journalists have been able to see the many obvious problems with the official story, but have been instructed in no uncertain terms that if they pursue investigations that run counter to the official story, that they will not be supported (or worse). One place to start is at architects and engineers for 911 truth; they've produced a new video "9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out"
      http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/544-eso-trailer.html
      Highly recommended.

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterFrank Syfert

      I believe it was you who said we'd have to hold our noses and vote for Obama in 2012. Well I'm not voting for anyone, and I think that if enough of us do that we could become a voting bloc to be reckoned with.

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterEdye Cox

      Peace should and could be easy to achieve were it not for the likes of corporacracy, the foreign corporate policy that has been around of well over a century, but for the miilitary-industrial-complex and its extensions auxilliaries and other what nots feeding off the economy for their profit...they have no reason to desire peace...they are getting too much of the piece of the war profiteering pie and Obama or whatever adiminstration lacks the guts, the courage, the will to fight for peace harder than they fight for war and its profits they receive one way or the other....I am now reading an interesting and revealing to some book called MANUFACTURING HYSTERIA: A History of Scapegoating, Surveillance, and Secrecy in Modern America, by Jay Feldman. Nick Turrse wrote a book, THE COMPLEX, which I have read it goes into and beyond just the Miliitary-Industrial Complex...which is insidious and entangle in our nations economy to the point of being fatal to its survival...

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterFred Jakobcic

      9-11 the great sin of our time.
      Frank Syfert in the comment above is right folks! The great elephant in the room is the flash point that launched all these wars and many people act like the little pigs in the house of straw and sticks. Denial, denial, denial. Let's face it, we were straight out lied to about the Gulf of Tonkin that expanded the Vietnam War and we have been dirty rat, hound dog, pig mud lied to on the events of 9-11. Yes look at what over 1,500 Engineers, Architects and 9-11 victims have to tell you! Don't be afraid to pull back the curtain. If little Toto could, so can you.
      www.AE911truth.org

      $4 trillion dollars since 911 and what do we have to show for it? A broken, sick, corporate dominated Empire! Only we, united can turn this around! Get on the bus...!!
      That's why events like this are going to happen. Are you ready? www.October2011.org

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterDo Right

      the only way to end the global war of terror is to work for America's defeat EVERYWHERE

      September 8, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterkronos

      great post, mr.hayden! there's hope for america, as long as people like you keep on!
      thanks!

      September 9, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterpaula serra

      Dragert's and Syfert's conspiracy theories are embarrassing. Do they have any idea how many dozens (hundreds?) of people it would take to
      bring down two gigantic buildings? Do they think that all of them would later remain silent about their conspiracy?
      We are living in dark reactionary times when fanatics of the Christian, Jewish, and Muslim right and conspiracy theorists of both the left and the right
      find willing ears to their paranoid rantings. Richard Hofstadter had it right when he talked about the paranoid style in American politics. We are living in a Dark Age indeed, an age when the irrational is often considered legitimate.

      September 10, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMarvin Mandell

      I find the comment on the number of deaths of Americans, and wounded in the wars since 9/11 interesting. I wonder what the point is? There where approximately 1500 deaths at Pearl Harbor, and a subsequent 415,000 US military deaths in WWII. Does Mr Hayden find WWII a worse moral case for war than the current War on Terror based on those numbers? It seems that is the logic being presented. Perhaps it's just that leftists love statistics because they can just point them out for the shock value? It seems that he must think the whole idea behind fighting Islamic religious totalitarianism was to kill as many of them as they did of us, or hopefully more, without any casualties on our side!? What a bizarre mentality, because that is the only conclusion I could draw from that paragraph. Mr Hayden would be morally OK with the war, if we had only lost 2995 Americans, or less, and why didn't he mentioned the number of injured from 9/11? How many medivacs were done that day? Just one final point on the manipulation of statistics. How many of the 40k or so wounded, were also part of the 50k or so Medivac'd out?

      September 12, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterNinthave
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.