The PJRC

The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 

     

     

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Monday
      Nov152010

      A Petition Against Four More Years of War

      Dear peace and justice activists,

      Please read, sign and circulate this petition against the Afghanistan War. This is urgent because peace groups in America, Canada and Europe want to state our opposition to the plan being proposed by President Obama to NATO on Friday in Lisbon. The plan for four more years of combat has been called “a victory for the military” by the New York Times. Only public opposition and pressure may cause the President and NATO to shorten their timelines for withdrawing our troops and launching a diplomatic exit strategy.

      We need to make sure that the President is aware that another four years of war will be a hard sell to the millions of Americans in the peace bloc of voters. The president's actual position remains flexible. He and his NATO allies are testing the waters of public opinion with this proposal. Only a forceful and rational pushback by public opinion can keep them from sliding further and further into an endless, unwinnable and unaffordable war.

      Sincerely,

      Tom Hayden

      SIGN THE PETITION

      We object to the United States proposal for Afghanistan being presented this week to NATO ministers.

      It is not a peace plan. It is a plan for four more years of combat by US and NATO forces.

      It is not a plan for US or Western troop withdrawals but for further occupation. It is a proposal to gradually lessen Western casualties and lessen Western visibility while transitioning to Western-financed, Western-armed, and Western-advised Afghan army combat in a civil conflict. It is a plan for long-term Western military bases.

      It is not a plan to stop al Qaeda or terrorists from attacking Western targets. There are virtually no al Qaeda left in Afghanistan. The most recent terrorist attacks on America have been inspired by our deepening wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan. In seeking to save our military reputation, we all but assure future threats against Western targets. CIA officials even describe Yemen’s al Qaeda cell as more dangerous than al Qaeda in Pakistan. [NYT, Oct. 18, 2010]

      It pre-empts the Administration’s own proposal for a full “review” of Afghan policy in December. The timing instead is aimed at shoring up a faltering Western alliance.

      The central proposal--to increase the scale of the Afghan army and police in order to prop up a corrupt Kabul regime--will never work without a parallel cease-fire, deep institutional reform, enforceable human rights, and peace-keeping arrangements with leadership by neutral countries.

      The current expenditure of over $100 billion American dollars per year for Afghanistan could be spent on medical care for 15 million veterans, or 15 million college scholarships, or 1.8 million new teachers, or 72 million installations of renewable energy for American homes.

      IF THE PRESIDENT SEEKS THE SUPPORT OF THE PEACE CONSTITUENCY WHICH CONTRIBUTED SO MUCH TO HIS 2008 VICTORY, HE SHOULD:

      • Stop placating Republicans and Pentagon generals who seek unaffordable and elusive “victories:
      • Heed and not disappoint the 75 percent of Democrats and 55 percent of Independents who want a timetable for withdrawal;
      • Launch regional diplomacy towards power-sharing in Afghanistan with greater urgency as the current military escalation;
      • Announce a substantial troop reduction from Afghanistan in 2011, and a complete phase-out in two years;
      • Stop the foreign drone attacks in Pakistan’s tribal areas and send massive medical aid and infrastructure assistance instead;
      • Keep his pledge to withdraw all US troops from Iraq by the end of 2011.

      TO THE NEW REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WE DEMAND:

      • That deficit hawks apply their budget philosophy to the trillion-dollar costs of these unfunded wars;
      • That the Republican leadership permit hearings, full debate and roll call votes on war funding and related amendments;

      As President Obama and Gen. Petraeus have said many times, there is no military solution in Afghanistan. We ask, how many more will die in pursuit of this impossible goal?

      SIGN THE PETITION

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (4)

      How would WE react if a power greater than us kept bombing our country -
      or a defenseless ally?
      Would we be surprised - or grateful - that some patriots fought back?
      (What would be our excuse for not joining them?)

      For our CHILDREN'S SAKE - for God's sake - stop this war.
      Killing innocent people CREATES more terrorists -
      more danger to our nation!!!

      Does the military-industrial complex NEED more terrorists,
      to justify it's existence?

      Please keep this petition going!

      November 20, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMae Stone

      Soft power leads not to peace but to the death of people the peace movement pretends to want to protect. Ultimately, you are about saving your own rear ends and you don't care one iota about the United States or its citizens. Or citizens that are dying at the hands of Saddam Hussein and other lovely terrorists.

      That's why you fall back on empty arguments--that leave you a laughing stock among American voters. terrorists existed before these wars--and they will exist after the wars.

      Here's the point: They don't exist because of the wars--but because some lovers of peace signal to murderers that there will be no forceful response to terrorist activities--just the "understanding that we deserved what we Americans get for having the nerve, the unmitigated gall to protect ourselves.

      terrorists are not to be understood; they are to be destroyed. That's the only way to deal with them.
      That's why two presidents of opposite ends of the political landscape have supported the wars--and left the troops over there.

      November 28, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBob Rowe

      Please hold thE thought with me ...
      that PEACE on EARTH
      and calmer weather patterns
      CAN
      >easily happen ...
      In a -moment or two of Silence- ...

      in ENOUGH of thE -colective Mind-.

      November 29, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLinda Ohlson Graham

      Sincere apology for the spelling error.

      November 29, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLinda Ohlson Graham

      PostPost a New Comment

      Enter your information below to add a new comment.
      Author Email (optional):
      Author URL (optional):
      Post:
       
      All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.