The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 



    Follow Tom


    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.

      Americans Welcome Sgt. Bergdahl Home

      A still from a video released by the Taliban of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, held captive since 2009. (Photo: 2014)After the negotiated release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, I called an old friend who spent years as a POW in Vietnam's prison camps to ask for his response. Preferring to keep his name out of the papers for the moment, he was following the situation closely. In summary though, what he said was as follows:

      First, the Pentagon will debrief Bergdahl for as long as two weeks, eight hours per day, assuming they follow protocols used in Vietnam. 

      Second, after debriefing, the Pentagon team will take on crisis management, how to shape and control Bergdahl's narrative, whether to ignore criticism about his anti-war statements made in captivity or even to blame Bergdahl. "They did the same kind of thing with us."

      Third, "so far, they are not into punishing him."

      Fourth, that is because, "Public opinion so far is solidly behind him,” and therefore, "It won't help to play that card." My POW friend thinks most Americans will be supportive of him whatever the facts turn out to be because, "People are sick of the war." 

      If the political right "tries anything, people will need to speak out" he added. 

      Already there is grumbling among Republicans, neo-conservatives, and within the armed forces about Bergdahl's statements, and rumors that he went AWOL. It is likely that Fox News will fan the flames.

      Before a storm gathers against Bergdahl, some facts are in order. 

      Bergdahl could have been released in the same prisoner swap nearly three years ago, but the Republican-led opposition scuttled the deal by opposing, "negotiating with terrorists." See the New York Times account of the suspension of secret talks between the US and the Taliban in March 2012, published December 20, 2012. Those talks held in Paris included US and French officials, a Taliban delegation and Abdullah Abdullah, then a CIA-supported leader of the Northern Alliance, who currently is poised to become Afghanistan's new president.

      According to the December 2012 account, the deal was aborted, "after the Obama administration failed to push through a proposed prisoner swap, which was to be the first of a series of confidence-building measures." That left Bergdahl stranded alone for another three years.

      By early 2014 American officials were outraged to learn that Karzai himself was opening secret talks with the Taliban with the US and NATO excluded. Then Karzai released 72 Taliban, "Accused of having American blood on their hands," asserting that evidence of their crimes was lacking. Over strong Pentagon objections, a Karzai commission released 560 other Taliban prisoners in mid-to late 2013. Not only did Karzai wish to curry favor with the Taliban but, "He could punish the United States for what he considered its insincere effort to initiate peace talks," according to the New York Times

      Bergdahl therefore was a pawn who survived in complete isolation for over three years during political games from Washington to Kabul. Does anyone seriously believe he could have survived captivity if he was in a constant state of rage against his captors? Isn't it possible he developed a certain level of understanding, even empathy, towards those holding him hostage?

      The truth may never come out, or be too complicated for many to fathom, but it should not be politicized to score points by Republicans who refuse to agree with Obama on anything. Republicans stalled the diplomatic process that could have brought Bergdahl home in 2013, presumably in much better health.

      To remember is important. In 1967, for example, I became involved in a release of three American POWs from the jungle camps of South Vietnam. I accompanied the three soldiers straight from their captivity, similar to Bergdahl's fate, though they were not alone, on planes from Phnom Penh through Lebanon and Paris to New York's JFK airport. In those three strange days I got to know the men very well. One of them, Ed Johnson, an Army soldier, was ill with a jungle disease and died a few years later. Another was an African-American Green Beret, James Jackson, who operated on the Ho Chi Minh trail until his capture. He retired into a medical practice and never spoke publicly about his feelings, except on one occasion when he came to Sacramento and he defended me against Republican charges that I was a traitor who should be expelled from the legislature. The third POW, Daniel Pitzer, soon became an outspoken crusader against communism, the Vietnamese, and all "traitors". A favorite of the Nixon White House, he even threw out first pitches at major league baseball games.

      That strident Pitzer was concealing something he told me on the long trip home. He taught English to his Vietnamese captors, which at the time was a breach of the military code of conduct. His militant anti-communism was related somehow to his fear of being accused of being soft on the Vietcong. I was glad he survived.

      I do not know, but I suspect that Vietnam veteran and now Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel helped guide Obama through the currents of spin to arrive at a sound decision in this case. An important precedent has been set, that under certain circumstances the United States should engage in trade-offs with opposing forces. Only an irrational rigidity, for example, is preventing Obama from organizing an exchange of three imprisoned Cubans, part of the Cuban 5, for Alan Gross, a US AID contractor jailed in Havana for having secretly smuggled communications equipment to groups opposed to the Castro government. The American Right insists that Gross be released unconditionally by the Cubans and rants against any thought of a negotiated outcome. If the Right succeeds in damaging Obama for bringing home Bergdahl, it will make arranging the release of Alan Gross all the more difficult. 

      However, going forward we have lost over three years. The US never should have started the Afghanistan War and never should have avoided the domestic consequences of talking with the Taliban. Now Obama is promising to end this war, see the White House charts that accompanied his speech, it is vital that the prisoner swap be a springboard for talks with the Taliban about power sharing. Obama might be able to secure a commitment to prevent what he fears most, a new sanctuary in Afghanistan for attacks against the US. The Taliban, who are at least as divided as the US government, should avoid the fatal mistake of triumphalism, which will lead to civil war and a possible American return via airstrikes, settle for a base in its southern and eastern heartland, internationalize Kabul, and invest in development for the next generation.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (17)

      The Republican and other so-called conservative welcome-homes aimed at Bowe Berdahl are rhetorical spitwads they're projecting his way, as well as to his parents too. This symbolic but venal treatment they're giving Berdahl and his family certainly trumps and is worse than the imaginary spitting done to Vietnam vets upon their return. The American Right knows no shame or boundaries, and has long since lost touch with any kind of respect, for others or themselves.

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterLarry Piltz

      I direct the Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless and Our Community at PEachtree-Pine. Vanessa is on our Board of Directors, and she is a love. We are a community of homeless, formerly homeless and never-been-homeless folks with a much-embattled building right slap on Peachtree Street. I have been a long-distance fan/groupie of yours for a long, long time. I really love your work and your words. Never stop; you are one of the few people God continues to spare our planet for -- to end a sentence with a preposition. Thank you,

      Anita Beaty -- 72 and rolling.

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterAnita Beaty

      The June 7, 2012 Rolling Stone article on Bowe Bergdahl is a must read. He clearly joined the Army with idealistic notions of helping the Afghanis. Clinton and Panetta apparently opposed negotiating for his release. Sec. Hagel made the difference.

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterEd Smeloff

      Thanks to Tom Hayden for writing what is such a clear and objective account of the return of Sgt. Bergdahl.

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterMichael Carmichael

      Thank you, Tom, for this detailed account. You should be interviewed by Lila Garrett, on Connect the Dots. However, Obama has delayed military withdrawal for Two Years. I know you agree. Why not mention the outrage of his same "Surge" 10,000 troops, that provided such a disaster? We need to get our killers out of Afghanistan. Stop the torture at Guantanamo.

      PS Notice how Ralph Nader's call for a Left-Right Alliance may have led to the wide spread Tea Party losses across the country. Well, we still have 6 months to delete the NSA surveillance state, arrest Wall Street criminals, break up the illegal Media and Bank monopolies, and maybe even extend the Supreme Court to Eleven Justices to kill Citizens United.

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterBill Floyd

      Best defense of a heroic soldier so far...impossible for MSM do w/ Poppy Bush plantation Opium War drones blaming Afghan victims by spinning successful black ops into intelligence failures their Stockholm Syndrome hostages in the media must view through that lens of upended truth

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterGreg Allen Getty

      Dear Tom, Very helpful and insightful, as usual.
      Best, Marvin Mandell, veteran WW2 (88th Infantry Div., Italy)

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterMarvin Mandell

      This is certainly an issue that will be discussed for a while. I have not made any conclusions for either side. Glad he will soon see his parents at least for a short time. Guess that the interviews with some of his unit members have made me curious about his so-called "walking away".

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterDoris V

      Thank you for such an insightful and sensible article. I wish every American would read it and learn something. This is a very complicated subject that requires a lot of understanding.

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterRegina Porto

      We need to start a petition/campaign to protect this brave soldier, and to make
      certain he isn't convicted by ugly Republicans and others who want to force
      further fascistic controls on free speech and conscientious objectors....

      June 4, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterLynn Feinerman
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.