The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 



    Follow Tom


    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.

      Cuba Leads While U.S. Lags in Ebola Battle

      Photo by the World Health Organization, taken in early October shows some of the medical professionals who have traveled from Cuba to help with the Ebola outbreak (Photo: WHO/S. Gborie, October, 2014)In what a New York Times editorial called "Cuba's Impressive Role on Ebola" (October 19, 2014), hundreds of Cuban doctors and nurses are being dispatched to West Africa to battle Ebola, train medical personnel, and create isolation and treatment centers. The Cubans are playing "the most robust role" of any country in battling the Ebola plague, which has erupted virulently because of a broad failure, according to the Times, "to produce medicines and vaccines for diseases that afflict poor countries."

      The US has 550 military personnel in Africa on counter-terrorism missions while over five thousand Africans have succumbed to the non-military threat of Ebola. Cuba is taking action in part because Ebola, unchecked, will spread to the Caribbean, but also out a consistent sense of humanitarian duty, which Washington fails to comprehend. Even the Times felt obliged to claim that the Cuban medical initiative is meant to shore up its "beleaguered international standing." What are the esteemed editors talking about? Cuba's reputation is among the best in the world, despite a mixed record on human rights, especially because of its highly regarded medical and education programs. The UN General Assembly votes 187-2 in favor of lifting the fifty-year old US blockade of the island.  Cuba has rushed medical personnel to many countries before, including hundreds to Haiti during its 2010 cholera epidemic. 

      Meanwhile in the US, profit-driven drug companies "have resisted spending the enormous sums needed to develop products useful mostly to countries will little ability to pay" - the Times adds. But in a globalized world where infections can spread virally, the US is geared to battle terrorism far more than plague. 

      In an Oct. 19 statement from Havana titled "Duty Calls", Fidel Castro wrote that "the medical professionals who travel to any location whatsoever to save lives, even at the risk of losing their own, provide the greatest example of solidarity a human being can offer, above all when no material interest whatsoever exists as a motivation." The Cuban leader was careful to note that while Cuba is "happy to cooperate" with the US it would not be "in search of peace between these two states which have been adversaries for so many years", but for a "world peace" that should be attempted. 

      Clearly, Cuba's humanitarian missions are meant to cultivate diplomatic support. But men and women do not risk their lives in plague zones in order to improve a diplomatic scorecard. They do so out of honor, patriotism, and sympathy with the poor of the earth. It would be a counter-productive mistake for anyone in the White House to believe that the Cuban action is designed to curry favor or extract a concession from Washington.  

      The US can try to quarantine Cuba while Ebola spreads or the US can, to quote President Obama, "lead by following" the Cubans in the fight. The US can provide its treatment center in Monrovia to Cuban personnel, send financial and medical aid, and make American aircraft available for emergency airlifts of infected Cuban doctors or nurses back to protected facilities. In a state of emergency, the White House can even restore diplomatic ties without requiring Congressional approval.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (1)

      Wow. You fell for it. You ran right past the science and dove right into the politics. Because there's just no scientific support for this view of "Ebola." None at all. It's detailed in this Podcast. In case you're still interested in the politics, you might learn that this "epidemic" comes suspiciously right on time for GlaxoSmithKline to get the go-ahead to "fast track" its testing of a vaccine on West African populations -- the WHO requires an actual epidemic to justify this ethically. This leaves the U.S. in a tight spot for trying to keep the hysteria off U.S. shores -- it's a hoax, after all -- and keeping the focus on West Africans, racist hysteria about dirty people, and so on. No wonder Obama is slow in keeping up with the likes of private enterprise (right-wing sites) and Cuba (left-wing sites) in fighting viral outbreaks. He simply doesn't care about protecting the U.S. population from an epidemic created by press release. . . . But just enough hysteria to support the U.S. invasion of West Africa would be fine. All that is exposed in this Podcast, too. Not exactly a secret, conspiratorial plan, if it's been public for 20 years. The U.S. wants bases in Africa. AFRICOM is based in Germany. What an embarrassment that is for the U.S.! For Obama, too, who needs to show he has "balls" around foreign policy. . . . So here it is, my own, "Port Huron Statement," Tom, as I am from that place, born in 1963. (Yeah, that was me in the front row at the junior college, on the 50th Anniversary. . . . )

      October 30, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterElizabeth
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.