The PJRC

The Peace Exchange Bulletin
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to the PJRC now!

    Make a tax-deductible donation of $25 or more and receive an autographed copy of Tom Hayden's newest book!

    Inspiring Participatory Democracy: Student Movements from Port Huron to Today

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town!

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Thursday
      Apr252013

      Guantanamo’s Death Row

      Dear Mr. President,

      Your Guantanamo choice – to release the hunger strikers or let them die – reminds me of Margaret Thatcher’s similar choice in 1981 when “the Iron Lady,” as her admirers called her, allowed 10 Irishmen to slowly starve to death because she would not recognize their most basic human rights. Thatcher’s stubborn reputation was preserved. But the whole world was watching. One of the strikers, Bobby Sands, was elected to parliament as he lay dying. The agony caused massive sympathy for Irish Republicans and led directly to the political success of Sinn Fein and the Good Friday peace agreement.

      You alone face a similar crisis. Despite your original vow to close Guantanamo, members of Congress, Democrats included, have blocked your every effort. It is understandable that you would hesitate to unilaterally release detainees held in Guantanamo by your own administration. But your policy of brutal force-feeding is an abhorrent example of torturing prisoners to “save” them. But if the alternative is to send an estimated 17 men to their deaths as martyrs, after excruciating treatment at the hands of their guards, under a global media spotlight, I believe that some in the White House are reconsidering the options. They must do so quickly.

      The White House has the power to reframe the issue. Your political opponents and many moderate voters define the detainees as terrorists who deserve their fate, and who, if released, will return to the battlefield against the United States. The facts are these: the total number at Guantanamo has declined from 240 to 166 since your promise to close the facility. There are 86 already designated for transfer, 56 of them from Yemen. You have the power, on a case-by-case basis, to release them, although many in Congress will complain vociferously. Sen. Diane Feinstein, however, already has called on you to lift the ban. Not only will such a step ease the Guantanamo crisis, it may facilitate the stalled talks with the Taliban. The release of one US prisoner held by the Taliban, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, has been blocked by House Republicans objecting to an exchange for some Taliban detainees in Guantanamo; the exchange was meant to be a step toward a negotiated settlement.

      The principle reason the Guantanamo detainees are willing to die is that that they believe, on the basis of all they know and have experienced, that there is no hope whatever for release in their lifetimes. While suicide bombers have committed their bodies as weapons, these prisoners are using their bodies nonviolently in a form of radical suicide.

      So here is a proposal:

      Commit to ordering the immediate release of a meaningful number of detainees already designated for transfer, in an attempt to persuade the hunger strikers to break their fast to the death. Give them hope. Stop delaying the de facto parole hearings you have promised, and to which the CIA objects because of the evidence of torture that might be introduced. Block the $200 million funding for permanent new prison facilities.

      Let us re-examine more critically the “threat” posed by releasing the Yemeni detainees. It is claimed by US intelligence that between 16 and 25 percent of the original Guantanamo detainees rounded up by George Bush are confirmed or suspected of having returned to terrorist battlefields. As the New York Times analysis points out, that implies that 72 percent “are living quietly.” (New York Times, April 25, 2013) Without question, of the official definitions, this would mean that up to 13 or 14 Yemenis now detained might well join ranks with Al Qaeda. Though your right-wing critics would inflate the threat and castigate your “softness,” the truth is that 14 more supporters of Al Qaeda in Yemen would make no difference at all. One might even argue that they serve Al Qaeda’s purposes more effectively in Guantanamo detention than using their English-language skills to become translators in some Sana underground office. Sen. Feinstein's letter suggests that Yemen's current regime, heavily bolstered by US forces, is capable of providing adequate security assurances for the detainees. In that case, there would be no problem whatsoever.

      The benefits to your administration and to the inevitable peace process ahead far outweigh those of helping the CIA or Guantanamo bureaucrats save face by hiding secrets, which someday will be revealed anyway.

      To summarize, free some Guantanamo detainees in order to end the Guantanamo hunger strike and restart the stalled peace talks with the Taliban.

      In Ireland, the polarizing reputation of the Iron Lady lives on, but the republicans she sent to Long Kesh are serving in the elected Irish government and a multitude of respected civil society institutions. Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness are received routinely at the White House, and especially by Rep. Peter King, the Republican who screams most loudly against any accommodation with “terrorists,” at least the dark-skinned Islamic variety.

      Do not go the way of Thatcher, Mr. President. Releasing some Guantanamo detainees will save lives, will be a gesture toward peace and will salvage some global respect for our country.

      Sincerely,

      Tom Hayden

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (7)

      Your letter is so well-argued. Thank you. Mine was shorter but I still ask does anybody see these letters?

      Dear President Obama

      I am sure you began as a good Christian, full of the truth. You promised to close Guantanamo Bay. This morning I saw this video about how Shaker Aamer is being tortured though 'cleared for release'.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=4Pd_shQtjxc

      It grieves me that your once great nation permits torture and abuse. Please take action to save my countryman, Shaker Aamer.

      Sincerely,

      John Goss.

      April 26, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Goss

      I would love to be able to show my support by adding my signature to this letter, which so well expresses my sentiments. I'm sure many others would love to do so, also. Is there a way to do this? Thank you for your work on the behalf of the Guantanamo detainees.

      April 26, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterElizabeth Baker

      Obama has reneged on every promise. He will NEVER close Guantanamo, and could not care less if innocent people die or are imprisoned for life. Yesterday, he called Bush a "good man," and has followed -- and even escalated -- all of Bush's national and international policies.
      Most Americans-- even idiots that think he's from Kenya --- agree with him on one point: Totally indifference to the suffering of anyone that is not "one of their own" --(i.e dark-skinned non- Judeo-Christians. )
      The Irish hunger strike elicited sympathy from Americans because there hasn't been any hatred for the Irish since the last half of the 20th Century. White skin and Christianity made it easier for them to assimilate. Unfortunately that is not the case for the people in Guantanamo.

      April 26, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMarta Barbosa

      You promised to close it down. It is a symbol to the world of our hypocrisy. A promise is a promise. It has no exceptions for political strategy.
      My campaign work for you was based upon my certainty of your honor. Where is it?

      April 26, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterShelley Brown

      Thanks for this Tom. I was in Derry in 1981 when Mickey Devine, an Irish Republican Socialist Party member & also a son of Derry, became the last of the Long Kesh hunger strikers to die. The memory of those dark, desperate days still haunt my memory. Like you, I have linked them to those at on hunger strike at Guantanamo and join you in urging President Obama to 'free some Guantanamo detainees in order to end the Guantanamo hunger strike and restart the stalled peace talks with the Taliban' and let the future take its course. That would be an act of a true statesman.

      April 27, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMargie Bernard

      Guantanamo is just one of many lingering horrors of G. W. Bu$h, Merchant of Death immoral war of choice. Many of these prisoners were taken in exchange for bounties from $6,000 to $20,000 paid to the Northern Alliance in 2002. This was our tax dollars but not in our name this does not reflect American values. Decades will pass before the innocent people of Afghanistan and Iraq recover from the destruction of their culture. Our nation has lost our standing as a beacon of hope and PEACE. Obama’s choice will reflect on our national image. Will Obama choose a path to PEACE?

      April 27, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMDA

      Reading about what is being done to these prisoners to 'save' them, sickens me. It is hypocrisy of the highest order, and my dear America is doing this in my name. NO, Mr. President. NO. Follow Tom's advice and release those cleared for release. How dare you do this torture in our name. How dare you go back on your promise to close Guantanamo? It's a large stain and growing on our national conscience and standing in the world. America is becoming morally bankrupt, and the lame 'excuse' of 'terror' is used to control and abuse, the prisoners. And I feel, as an American citizen, I am being controlled and abused, and it's morally wrong. We don't care and you shouldn't either, whether the CIA, etc. is outed on their tortuous strategies. Most people understand that it has occurred anyway. And as Tom says, it will eventually be found out. Please don't be an Iron Man. Please keep your promises! We shouldn't even have to ask! And what about Social Security also. That's another promise broken. Shame on you. Rise to this occasion, and stop worrying about who won't like it. TOUGH. It's tough to stand tall and strong in the face of slings and arrows, and I understand you've had more than your share. Stop letting the small minds run things! We are bigger than this. At least we used to be.

      April 27, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterLola Terrell
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.