The PJRC

The Peace Exchange Bulletin
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to the PJRC now!

    Make a tax-deductible donation of $25 or more and receive an autographed copy of Tom Hayden's newest book!

    Inspiring Participatory Democracy: Student Movements from Port Huron to Today

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town!

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Wednesday
      Jul102013

      How New York Stopped Shale Fracking

      Low-angle faults and out-of-phase detachment folds in the Monterey shale. The oil industry wants to tap the shale, stretching from Northern California to Los Angeles, by means of fracking and other methods.

      Anthony Ingraffea is a Cornell professor who has been immersed in the science, politics and resistance to the development of oil and gas from shale in New York State for five years. After a long grassroots battle, New Yorkers have succeeded in achieving a five-year moratorium, and Governor Andrew Cuomo has promised he will make a decision on permits based on studies yet to be completed. Over 100,000 Californians already have signed a petition against such fracking.

      An Interview with Anthony Ingraffea, Ph.D., P.E.

      Tom Hayden: What conclusions did you draw about framing the issue? Why did you decide it is not about “fracking” per se?

      Dr. Anthony Ingraffea.Anthony Ingraffea: If you don’t name a problem correctly, you are not likely to solve it correctly. The issue has become known as “fracking” in popular culture, but we came to realize that it’s not fracking per se, but the use of fracking in the development of oil/gas from shale. More exactly, the development and use of oil/gas from shale using multi-well, clustered pads, with high volume fracking in multi-staged, long laterals: that is the problem. “Fracking” has been done in CA and elsewhere for many decades--if you find that objectionable, where were you all those years? Fracking is only one of many enabling technology and engineering elements in shale oil/gas development. In CA, the potential development of the Monterey shale in this manner is the problem. What makes shale development a big problem--with water, air, and climate--are its scale and spatial intensity. Because shale is inherently impermeable, and individual well productivity quickly nosedives, you need many (as in tens of thousands in the Monterey) wells, closely spaced underground, hence the need for multi-well, clustered pad arrangements. Take a look at the attached PPT animated view of the Barnett shale development under the Dallas/Fort Worth airport: that is spatial intensity Because shale is inherently impermeable, you need to inject 50-100 times more frack fluid (fracking is not the problem, it is the SCALE of the fracking that is part of the problem) into much longer wells, wells with laterals that might be longer than the well is deep. Now one can see need for intense industrialization on the landscape scale,truck trips, local air/water/noise/light pollution, the competition for water, waste hauling and disposal, many processing plants, compressor stations (for gas), thousands of miles of pipelines, habitat fragmentation, leaks, vents, flares, etc. even at small probability of failure, the risks go up because of the number of times you roll the dice.

      TH: It took almost five years to win in New York. Tell us about the stages and the quarrels you went through.

      AI: Years one (2007) and two: hundreds of grassroots organizations form across the state. Ragged levels of understanding of technology and engineering, risk, consequences. Ragged objectives also: ban? ban what? moratorium? on what, for how long? can’t we just get along? Forming.

      Years two and three: wow, there are a helluva lot of organizations and folks, let’s get together and form a super-organization. Oops, we don’t all agree on the key issues, objectives, means. Screaming and shouting and fuming and leaving. Personality issues emerge. Forming/storming.

      Years three and four: patience, organizational brilliance, and luck (gas price plummets, PA reveals the ugly side of shale gas development right next store, NYS has a SEQRA law). Passionate/charismatic zealots emerge, coordinated with passionate/informed visionaries, and modulated by honest brokers with a sense of realism. Aha, it is not fracking that is the problem, it is everything that comes before and after, the whole life cycle of development that present all the risks and downsides. There are economic and sociologic and political battles to be fought. Forming/storming/norming.

      Years four and five: peaceful co-existence among the hundreds of groups, with most rallying behind trusted leadership of a few. Statewide initiatives to engage under SEQRA. Successful resistance to acceptance of first, second, and third drafts of the SGEIS (supplemental generic environmental impact statement) with tens of thousands of written public comments, and successful resistance to promulgation of “toughest regulations in the country,” with over 200,000 written public comments. Bring in the science: oops, where is it? Successful PR through LTTE, public for a, rallies, letters to the Governor, testimony to the legislature, showing that the science has NOT been done, not the climate science, not the economic science, and especially not that related to cumulative impacts on human health. Forming/storming/norming/performing.

      TH: What role was played by the major environmental groups?

      AI: The big enviro groups were late to the table or not participating in resistance. Sierra Club (Atlantic) was a strong ally from day 1. Sierra Club national catches up in year 4. The smaller groups, EARTHWORKS, Earthjustice, Environmental Working Group were very effective from day 1.

      Environmental grant makers very supportive from day 1.

      TH: Tell us about the political strategy.

      AI: See above, but also: NYS is a home rule state. Excellent attorneys scoured the state to encourage the use of zoning to zone out heavy industrial activity where it does not belong. Two landmark cases were won in State Supreme Court in year 5 that confirm that towns have the legal authority to do so. Many towns and municipalities are now protected or staging for protection: 209 Communities Protected, (48 of these are in the NYC/Syracuse Watersheds), 91 Municipalities Staging for Passage of Draft Legislation – 300 Municipalities as of 6/12/13.

      TH: What has been the outcome and where are you now?

      AI: NY State has been in an effective moratorium against shale gas development (not against fracking which still continues in the state in non-shale formations) for nearly 5 years. It is the Governor’s decision to make whether to allow permitting. But he has no SGEIS, no regulations, and no health study completed. His latest public statement is that he will make a decision before next year’s election.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (2)

      Anthony--

      Where have I / we been -in California? Right here, working hard towards garnering accountability by the oil and gas industry. There may not have been many of us but as Mr. Hayden well knows, we have been here working hard and have had numerous successes in illuminating potentially hazardous oil and gas field practices and locations.

      It was with mixed feelings that I have watched the east to west areas of America explode with fracking issues of concern. While I would not wish fracking or numerous other oil and gas field practices upon anyone, it was nice to see America wake up and fight back against the hazards that we have long been fighting.

      I look forward to the collaboration.

      Patricia McPherson, President-Grassroots Coalition
      Los Angeles, California

      July 16, 2013 | Unregistered Commenterpatricia mcpherson

      Anthony-

      Enjoyed your timeline and recounting of the evolution of a revolution. Yes, it's true- many enviros in California did not have oil and gas well stimulation on our radar until after we learned about Pennsylvania, Colorado, Texas, North Dakota. Clean Water Action has been working for a long time in other states and only a few years in California. But we are here, we are organizing, and we are grateful for the expertise you have contributed to move the issue to forward. Yes- we didn't know it was happening here all along- but watch California go from zero to sixty- it's happening. When we first starting talking to citizens at their front doors each night in the SF Bay Area two years ago, no one knew what fracking is, now people not only by and large know about it, they want to stop it. While the timeline is uncertain, we will stop those drillers.

      Miriam Gordon
      California Director, Clean Water Action

      July 18, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMiriam Gordon
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.