The PJRC

The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 

     

     

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Thursday
      Dec122013

      Is It Time for the U.S. to Shake Cuba's Hand Too?

      President Obama shakes hands with Cuban President Raul Castro during the official memorial service for former South African President Nelson Mandela in Johannesburg. (Photo: Getty Images, December 10, 2013)This Op-Ed Originally Appeared in the Los Angeles Times, December 13, 2013, Page A33.

      --

      The handshake between President Obama and Raul Castro at Nelson Mandela's memorial service would have made the South African leader smile. It was the latest sign of a gradual thawing in relations between Washington and Havana after a frozen half-century.

      It hasn't been easy. Obama favored diplomatic recognition and lifting the embargo as far back as when he was a state legislator in Illinois, and he has steadily eased restrictions on travel since taking office.

      But many on the American right, especially octogenarian Cuban immigrants from the Bay of Pigs generation, have stubbornly resisted normalizing relations with Cuba. Now, though, it seems as if the process is developing a momentum of its own.

      Part of the reason involves changes taking place in Cuba. Cubans today are living in the "pre-post-Castro era," in the charming phrase of the late Alfredo Guevara, a close friend of Fidel's and a longtime leader in arts and film. Under Raul Castro, the nation has gradually opened its private sector to a new generation of Cuban entrepreneurs, as reported in a recent study by Richard Feinberg, a top advisor to President Clinton on inter-American affairs. The Cubans are moving toward market socialism, with a strong state protecting its widely admired healthcare, education and social programs.

      When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, devastating Cuba's economy, it was widely predicted that a popular anti-Castro revolution would quickly follow, as happened in Eastern Europe. But that was almost 25 years ago, and it never happened — not because Cuba is a perfect police state but because the Cuban people deeply prefer a peaceful transition to a future they themselves choose. Vain attempts to return to the past, or plunge into civil war, are not real alternatives compared with gradual evolution.

      Perhaps the most serious evidence of a sea change is the fact that 450,000 Cuban Americans now travel back and forth to Cuba legally each year to visit relatives. They also send remittances, last year more than $2 billion. This process is occurring despite the opposition of the supposedly all-powerful Cuban lobby in Congress. Why? It is an irreversible tide, and the two countries understand this.

      Both Secretary of State John F. Kerry and Ricardo Alarcon, the longtime retired Cuban foreign minister, United Nations representative and National Assembly president — whom I have interviewed extensively over the years — used identical terminology recently in describing the Cuban diaspora as "effective ambassadors" during the transition to more normal relations between the two countries.

      In Kerry's (and Obama's) version, these Cubans are irresistible ambassadors of democracy and consumer capitalism. Alarcon too sees the potential for good in the exchange: "They can bring some different elements here, maybe in fashion and music. So you will get a mutual influence. I don't really see a problem with that."

      He thinks Americans who travel to Cuba will also gain from the experience. Visiting Cuba, he says, will challenge "the mentality of those Cuban Americans who think everyone from Cuba is a terrorist."

      There are still many obstacles to normalizing relations, of course, but they can be overcome gradually. It would help to have a special envoy to serve in the way George Mitchell did during the protracted Irish peace talks. Obama's next step should be to remove Cuba from the State Department's list of nations embracing state-sponsored terrorism. That no-brainer would ease Cuba's ability to engage in financial transactions abroad.

      After that, Cuba and the United States should diplomatically arrange a sequenced release of prisoners who have become sticking points in relations between the two countries. Cuba should release the American contractor Alan Gross, who sits in prison after taking prohibited advanced communications equipment into Cuba on multiple occasions. The U.S. should release four imprisoned members of the so-called Cuban Five back to Cuba. The men were convicted in Miami of conspiracy to commit espionage and other charges after the Cuban air force shot down two planes carrying anti-Castro Cuban exiles.

      Obama recently returned one of the five, Rene Gonzales, to serve his probation time in Havana. If the release of the other four seems politically impossible, consider the fact that in 1979 Jimmy Carter released four Puerto Ricans convicted of shooting up the U.S. Congress and trying to kill the president in 1952. After he did so, in a carefully separate but sequenced action, the Cubans released thousands of political prisoners, including many Americans.

      A big impediment to normalization is the Helms-Burton Act, which grants Congress broad powers in determining U.S. relations with Cuba and prohibits recognition of a Cuban government that includes either of the Castro brothers. Obama will have to be determined and nimble in getting around congressional opposition, something he's shown himself able to do.

      It's time. Obama should want his legacy to include being the first president in the last half-century to recognize its long-estranged neighbor. Let's hope the handshake at Mandela's funeral — with the whole world watching — signaled his intent.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (2)

      I' m Cuban American. Let's say it better I'm a Progressive Cuban American who saw hope in the hand shaking between Raul Castro and Barack Obama . I would never came to Usa if the Cuban Government,at that time under Fidel,didn't consider illegal the creation of an independent newspaper.But times change and I think about all Cubans in the Island who deserve these changes.
      So yes, I was happy when I saw the hand shaking because I saw hope for my people in Cuba.
      And for the politicians in Congress,specifically Ms. Ross lethinen I would ask to evolve and stop playing nasty political games. This is the moment for progressive congress people to expose her for her double standars in her political positions.
      Yes, if these two governmenta decide to change things, this would be the best tribute to Nelson Mandela !

      December 13, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterMagnolia Izquierdo

      Hasta La Victoria! Thank you for your thoughtful commentary on the handshake issue. I'm glad to see a glimmer of hope in this recent thawing out of US-Cuba relations -- can't happen too soon in my opinion. The 1% have consistently tried, without success, to prevent the 99% of us from finding out how well so-called "socialist" states are faring. As we Americans see our social benefits threatened and our national infrastructure eroding, we begin to search for alternative models of democratic governance and sturdy economic growth. Clearly the US, which is rapidly falling farther & farther behind the curve, no longer serves as a standard.

      December 14, 2013 | Unregistered CommenterJoan W. Drake
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.