The PJRC

The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 

     

     

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Friday
      Mar182011

      Libya

      The U.S. and other countries will be hammering Libya from the air. There are two possibilities ahead:

      First, the less-disastrous scenario: the bombings stop the progression of the Libyan army, and bottled-up contradictions within the Qaddafi regime lead to implosion and revolt from within. Peacekeeping troops are employed while a new governing process including elections is implemented.

      Second, the more-disastrous scenario: the bombing fails, as bombing often does, and the U.S. and other foreign powers are pulled into a quagmire or civil war without an exit strategy.

      Politically, peace advocates may well be divided about the military intervention, influenced by the specter of Libyan troops massacring the rebels in Benghazi. If the peace movement, such as it is, appears to advocate “doing nothing”, that position will be difficult to explain in the short run. Instead, I think the peace movement should  warn against this new intervention turning into a quagmire/civil war with no exit strategy. That position leaves room for those who oppose the bombing, those who think it must be limited, and those who simply don’t know. And it positions us for the debate the country needs to have, a debate on the Long War becoming a Long Quagmire.

      America’s partners in the “war on terror”, including Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen and Libya are in collapse, raising profound questions about the strategy. America’s economy is in deep recession, raising profound questions about the wisdom of spending trillions of dollars on foreign quagmires. America’s politics are in a crisis of democratic legitimacy, with the administration and Congress ignoring the fact that two-thirds of the American people want out of Afghanistan. Finally, we are in a crisis of vision, in which the Long War is pursued mindlessly to keep controlling resources, while coal mining disasters, off shore drilling disasters, and now nuclear disasters are threatening planetary equilibrium. The alternative must be to end these wars and tranfer resources into clean energy alternatives and domestic priorities.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (1)

      My idea of a "no-fly zone" was something akin to this street analogy . . . You see two guys with knives about to fight each other in the street. You have the biggest gun in town, so you use it to step in and give them both boxing gloves and let them work out what their problem is on their own. As such, I was all in favor of the no-fly zone. After all, the US was going along "reluctantly". Right. The next day, the "coalition" is dropping bombs as a "preemptive strike"? I didn't realize we were taking a side and thought that we were just protecting the civilians by making sure civilians were not bombed from the air. Now the US is the one dropping all the bombs to take a side? Oh, France has the lead. Sure. And Canada is always big in any coalition. All the US did here was to once again use its big gun to disarm one of the guys with knives, the one the US sees as less favorable to US interests. At the end of this thing, maybe we can send legal advisers to Libya to educate them on how to conduct a fair trial for Mr. Khadaffi, and then some CIA advisers can bring in a really big rubber noose that is sure to snap his neck. Maybe the US (I mean France) could provide a few ground troops for a few years just to "maintain stability" in the region.

      March 21, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterRon Austin
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.