The PJRC

The Peace Exchange Bulletin
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to the PJRC now!

    Make a tax-deductible donation of $25 or more and receive an autographed copy of Tom Hayden's newest book!

    Inspiring Participatory Democracy: Student Movements from Port Huron to Today

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town!

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Wednesday
      Feb152012

      Occupy Chicago, 1968 Again?

      With Adbusters inviting 50,000 “culture jammers” to attend the NATO-G8 Chicago summit May 18-20, as part of an “International Spring Offensive” beginning on May 12, the Occupy movement will experience new growth – and new tests – this spring.

      The Occupy movement already has influenced the 2012 national elections by “changing the conversation” to a greater focus on economic inequality, Wall Street corruption and the evils of money in politics more than any time in six decades. But there appears to be no chance that Occupy will engage with or campaign for candidates, or even lobby for specific proposals for policy reform. Those efforts will be up to organized labor, environmentalists, peace advocates, online advocates, Progressive Democrats, and a few elected officials and candidates around the country.

      The question is what Occupy will do instead. One possibility is employing creative techniques to advance general proposals with wide acceptance in the movement: promoting the “Robin Hood” tax on financial transactions, for example, which was the single demand originally proposed by Adbusters for last September 17, 2011.

      The summit of the One Percent (NATO and the G8) does present an opportunity for an alternative platform if any consensus can be reached by Occupy, the throngs of demonstrators coming, or millions watching around the world. At the core, such a platform should include:

      • The US and NATO pulling out of Afghanistan as rapidly as possible;

      • The annual US cost for Aghanistan - $113 billion request this year – should go to education, green jobs and health care;

      • The proposed financial transaction tax would net $1.2 trillion in annual revenue and dampen incentives for speculation;

      • A re-launch of the global push for renewable resources, energy conservation and global warming reduction;

      • Invigorating participatory democracy by banning doctrines that “corporations are people” or “money is speech.”

      In the absence of some such messaging, the Chicago spectacle is likely to be one of street battles, tear gas, police brutality, and mass arrests. That seems to be what the FBI, the Chicago police and Mayor Rahm Emanuel are prepared for. Where are Chicago’s progressive congressional representatives? Where is the Congressional progressive caucus? Where are the AFL-CIO and the Sierra Club? An opportunity to galvanize American and global support for a truly progressive vision could be squandered.

      The popular Chicago-based television series, Boss, starring Kelsey Grammer as a cross between King Lear and Mayor Daley, is scheduled to launch its new season just before the NATO-G8 summits begin and continue deep into the election year. The production company has been advised that no permits will be allowed while the One Percent of NATO-G8 descends on the glitzy lakefront hotels. What will turn out to be real and what surreal remains to be revealed.

      Adbusters itself seems devoted to a battle for the cultural imagination. In the current issue, they once again extol the French situationist philosopher Guy Debord who advocated detournement, a turning around of the consumer spectacle which they felt was kidnapping their lives. Adbusters is promoting “design anarchy”, including visual disruptions and “culture jamming” that cause “cognitive dissonance.” In 1968, the same philosophy animated Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin. There is no doubt that the cultural revolutionaries won the theatrical battle, became radical legends, and undermined support for Vietnam. But it is also true that the Republican conservatives Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, and lurking behind them, J. Edgar Hoover, won political power on platforms of imposing law-and-order on “bums” and “dirty hippies.”

      Which might it be this time? The clock is ticking towards Chicago.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (2)

      Maybe the best option for progressives is to call for a cancellation of the G-8 meeting. I don't think Mayor Emmanuel can or wants to control the police.

      February 17, 2012 | Unregistered Commentermichael kranish

      Occupy Chicago? 1968 Again? Or, better, the "March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom" (August 1963)? Nobody who is part of the current Movement for civil rights and economic justice will, quite rightly, compromise their values. That said, how do we most effectively deliver our message to The People? To get them to support our Movement? Anyone worth their salt is ultimately for peaceful, nonviolent demostrations. And nobody wants to be on the billy-club-end of a police riot. So, what do we do? Personally, though I was born after it, I have always admired the "March on Washington" where many "protesters" dressed in their Sunday-best. Where there was soaring speeches. Where there was inspirational music. Where people of all colors & creeds locked arms. Which was a model of peace & free speech. So, if public activities around the G8-NATO summit devolve into a messy, violent morass of bodies -- a war on the streets -- to be broadcast around the world in the hometown of our first Black president seeking re-election, then be prepared for possibly unsatisfactory electoral returns in November? Mmm, maybe, maybe not. For ironically, the Occupy Movement sees Obama and his so-called coddling of Wall Street as part of the problem of Corporate Establishment (whereas the Tea Party Movement, the other populist movement but coming in from the Right, sees Obama as part of the problem of the Government Establishment). So, for those going to Chicago, what will you do? Think about it. Long & hard. And I will get back to you.

      February 19, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterKristin from Virginia
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.