The PJRC

The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 

     

     

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Wednesday
      Oct202010

      Pentagon War on WikiLeaks Ratchets Up

      From a nondescript building near the Pentagon, the US government is deploying more than 120 analysts and operatives in its information war against WikiLeaks, while the whistleblower Julian Assange has been denied a residential permit by the new Swedish government. 

      The immanent question is whether WikiLeaks will release tens of thousands of top-secret documents, as the organization has threatened to do for several weeks, or whether the organization is in the midst of an implosion.

      The declared purpose of the Pentagon war room is to protect Western security in Afghanistan, but exploring an espionage indictment against Assange is the agenda of a Pentagon-Justice Department task force. Efforts to jam the Wikileaks servers also may be underway. WikiLeaks also says it is unable to obtain funds from its donors through the London-based pass-through agency it normally uses. [al-Jazeera-English] And a German spokesman for WikiLeaks has left the organization, alleging it has focused too heavily on the United States. [NYT, Sept. 27]

      In June the government arrested 23-year old intelligence specialist Bradley Manning, who is accused of downloading tens of thousands of classified files. Manning is likely to be pressured to testify against Assange.

       
      Meanwhile, Assange’s troubles continue in Sweden, where the newly-elected government is loosely allied with the US and ultimately looking for NATO membership. Sweden can no longer be considered a sanctuary for war resisters or, in this case, anti-war whistleblowers.
       
      Assange was trapped in sexual harassment and rape charges by two separate Swedish women in August, two days after he applied for residential status, a standing which would allow his company’s servers to be protected under tough Swedish laws on freedom of the press.
       
      Assange has not been seen publicly since a London speech on September 30.
       
      The mainstream media has failed to report the Pentagon’s anti-WikiLeaks war room except for a Sept. 12 article in The Daily Beast by Philip Shenon, an investigative reporter for the New York Times from 1981 to 2008. 

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (5)

      A hot link or url to the daily beast post would be useful if you have it handy.

      October 20, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterDaniel Millstone

      I,m reminded of two statements: "the truth will set you free", and MLK'S on how at times" silence becomes treason".
      Assange is a brave man doing service to all , his reward may be prison or an "untimely" death. Questioning authority & speaking truth to power are dangerous - yet necessary. May we all fight the good fight when our time comes, win or lose, for ourselves and mankind.

      October 20, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterbriantim

      Thank you, Daniel. The article has been update. A link to The Daily Beast is now included.

      October 20, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterModerator

      Well so much for transparency....I guess we won't be hearing about the leaks on C-Span.

      October 20, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBill McLaughlin

      "The immanent question is whether WikiLeaks will release tens of thousands of top-secret documents, as the organization has threatened to do for several weeks, or whether the organization is in the midst of an implosion. "

      I don't think immanent means what you think it means. Nor does the probably intended word "imminent" really work there either. This oh so very important question is nonsense, presenting an either-or about the release versus an implosion; there is no reason to believe that one would lead to the other or vice versa.

      October 22, 2010 | Unregistered Commentergrammarlogiccop

      PostPost a New Comment

      Enter your information below to add a new comment.
      Author Email (optional):
      Author URL (optional):
      Post:
       
      All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.