The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 



    Follow Tom


    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.

      Petraeus, Gates Acknowledge Failure of U.S. Combat Strategy

      David Petraeus, now CIA director, had some gloomy answers in response to a recent New York Times interview with Roger Cohen:  

      He told me that, as Libya illustrates, the United States is no longer “eager to get all the way in on the ground”; and that “We have long since recognized that the ideal situation in the fight against extremists, against terrorists is first and foremost to provide intelligence to the host nation.” Then, “if they cannot act on it, help them develop the ability to do it for themselves.”

      As for “actually doing it ourselves,” that must be a “much more remote option.”

      A decade of fighting has slashed the U.S. appetite for war. It eats cash, costs lives and these days there’s never a victory parade. That “much more remote option” struck me as the politic Petraeus version of the Robert Gates Pentagon-exit credo: “Any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa should ‘have his head examined,’ as General MacArthur so delicately put it.”

      These statements by Petraeus suggest that the U.S. combat phase of the Long War is over, ending in strategic defeat. Drone attacks, secret Special Forces raids, and training of mercenary armies is sure to continue, a return to low-visibility warfare. While the peace movement will be challenged to effectively oppose secret military interventions with few if any American casualties, the greater difficulty is for the US to succeed in imposing unpopular and repressive regimes on hostile populations.

      In any event, the current land wars are far from over, though the American combat role is being phased out. Petraeus, the CIA and the Pentagon are in retreat – or better, redeployment – to their secret sanctuaries.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (1)

      The parameters of the "debate" that the American people are invited to engage in are too narrow. Americans must confront and answer the questions, "Do we want to be an Empire?" and, if so, "What sort of Empire do we want?" Can an Empire be benevolent and progressive? Or, do we desire to be "first among equals?" How can this contradiction be resolved? Considering that every Empire ever born has died violently or withered into insignificance, is this what lies down the road for us? What is the role of capitalism in this depraved process of everlasting war, and periodic mass unemployment due to the squandering of lives and resources? Can capitalism be reformed, or, must it always be, as Karl Marx said, "capital versus labor"? In other words, class war, or peaceful civil society? Until Americans hear and consider these questions, a "national debate" is ignorant and absurd. It was obvious to most leftists at the outset that both wars were doomed to defeat; but the Left is nearly invisible in the United States. We need an articulate, openly leftist spokesman, a recognized leader, with the ability to grab the nation's attention, dramatically and forcefully, to turn the debate into something meaningful. I nominate Tom Hayden.

      August 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMike Havenar
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.