The PJRC

The Democracy Journal
Search Site
Get Involved
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Support the PJRC

    Support the PJRC for continued original analysis on ending the wars, funding domestic priorities and preserving civil liberties.

    Make a contribution to benefit the PJRC now! 

    Conferences & Events

    Tom Hayden speaks in Port Huron, MI, in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Port Huron Statement.

    Invite Tom Hayden to speak in your town! 

     

     

    Follow Tom

                    

    Contact Us
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Thursday
      Mar292012

      With San Onofre Down, What's Up?

      It may take a Fukushima-type nuclear disaster to force California away from its reliance on two aging, dangerous nuclear plants at San Onofre or Diablo Canyon. The Fukushima catastrophe has virtually stopped the nuclear industry in Japan, and moved enlightened Germany to phase out its nuclear dependency. With the virtual disappearance of the robust anti-nuclear movement of the late 1970s, public opinion is adrift and state officials are focused on other crises like the budget for education.

      But the shutdown of San Onofre and recent intervention by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission offer a new opportunity for California to resume its now-dormant role as a global leader in rejecting nuclear for conservation and renewables. A report this week by a nuclear consultant to Friends of the Earth suggests that a “culture of secrecy” has allowed the San Onofre damage to leaking reactors to be under-stated.

      An emergency is predictable if San Onofre remains shut down as the summer approaches, requiring emergency generation and conservation measures and  millions in new ratepayer costs. Customers of SoCal Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric already pay higher rates for the $671 million cost to replace  steam generators in 2010 and 2011 which now have failed.

      CALPIRG is ramping up its efforts divert the state from nuclear power into a “flex your power” campaign like the 2001 effort which reduced peak consumption by 9 percent statewide. Calls are being issued for immediate hearings and action by Gov. Jerry Brown and Sen. Barbara Boxer. California “can’t count on nuclear power and should stop investing in it,” says CALPIRG state director Emily Rusch.

      PrintView Printer Friendly Version

      EmailEmail Article to Friend

      Reader Comments (1)

      How, with more than 60,000 MW to draw from, can keeping the electricity on in Southern California this summer have become dependent upon an aging 2,250 MW nuclear plant with osteoporosis in its steam tubes? It's understandable why Southern California Edison would build the grid that way, but we've had a so-called "Independent" System Operator making these planning/investment decisions for 14 years now. If blackouts come, there will be hell to pay. http://www.cacurrent.com/storyDisplay.php?sid=5833

      April 1, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Geesman
      Comments for this entry have been disabled. Additional comments may not be added to this entry at this time.